Legal Opinion

Nio v. United States Department of Homeland Security

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 21, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2017-0998Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KUSUMA NIO, et al., Plaintiffs, V. Civil Action No. 17-0998 (PLF) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. meee Newel Nene Name None Nee Nowe Nee Neer See? See? See” MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Kusuma Nio, et al., and defendants, the United States Department of Homeland Security, et al., have filed a Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Regarding Plaintiffs’ Claims for Equal Access to Justice Act Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Joint Motion for Attorneys’ Fees”) [Dkt. No. 337]. The Court will grant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Salazar Ex Rel. Salazar v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API