Legal Opinion

Shroyer v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1965No. 8545PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

99 Ariz. 265 (1965)

408 P.2d 406

David R. SHROYER, Petitioner,

v.

The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona and Chicago Bridge and Iron Company, Respondents.

No. 8545.

Supreme Court of Arizona. En Banc.

December 9, 1965.

A.D. Ward, Minne & Sorenson, Phoenix, for petitioner.

Courtney L. Varner, Industrial Commission, Joseph P. Ralston, Ryley, Carlock & Ralston, Phoenix, for respondents.

McFARLAND, Justice.

In the decision in this case, 98 Ariz. 388, 405 P.2d 875, on September 29, 1965, we set aside the award of the Industrial Commission. The respondents contend in their motion for rehearing that we did not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Steward v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Shroyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Magma Copper Company v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Shroyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maness v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Laird v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Raban v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Turley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Soto v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API