Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. Ewing

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 23, 1989No. 22946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

The partners of Dutchland Investments (Dutchland) brought this action to enforce an oral contract to convey real estate. The Honorable Frank P. McGowan directed a verdict for the defendant, Ewing, on Dutchland’s causes of action for breach of contract, conversion, and breach of trust. Additionally, the trial judge granted a voluntary nonsuit to Dutchland on its cause of action against Ewing for unjust enrichment. At the same time, the judge granted a voluntary nonsuit to Ewing on its counterclaim against Dutch-land for consequential damages allegedly suffered as a result of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McMillan v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Scurry v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Aust v. BeardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Crout v. South Carolina National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  5. Beckham v. ShortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. PritcherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API