Aurora Consolidated Health Care & Sentry Insurance v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentPatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 82. (dissenting). Statutory procedures for worker's compensation actions matter because they provide a level playing field for both employees and employers. When the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) does not follow statutory procedures and this court affirms what LIRC has done, the court's decision harms both employees and employers by changing the process the legislature has created to fully and fairly resolve worker's compensation claims.
¶ 83. In the case now before us, LIRC arbitrarily prevented the employer, Aurora Consolidated Health Care, from rebutting, by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Lisney v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Coulee Catholic Schools v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Beecher v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Bituminous Casualty Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.