Legal Opinion

Barry v. Cavanagh

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 5, 1879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSoule, J.

The plaintiffs sue to recover unliquidated damages for breach by the defendants of their contract to accept a quantity of paving stones, which they had agreed to buy of the plaintiffs. The defendants answer to the merits, and file a declarar tian in set-off. But the plaintiffs’ demand is not the subject of set-off. Gen. Sts. c. 130, §§ 3, 7. It is unnecessary, therefore, to consider whether the instructions to the jury as to the set-off were correct or not, because no right of the defendants was or could be prejudiced by them. Montague v. Boston & Fairhaven Iron Works, 97 Mass. 502.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Montague v. Boston & Fairhaven Iron WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barrie v. QuinbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Acme Food Co. v. OlderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Tufts v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Barton v. RadclyffeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API