Barry v. Cavanagh
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSoule, J.
The plaintiffs sue to recover unliquidated damages for breach by the defendants of their contract to accept a quantity of paving stones, which they had agreed to buy of the plaintiffs. The defendants answer to the merits, and file a declarar tian in set-off. But the plaintiffs’ demand is not the subject of set-off. Gen. Sts. c. 130, §§ 3, 7. It is unnecessary, therefore, to consider whether the instructions to the jury as to the set-off were correct or not, because no right of the defendants was or could be prejudiced by them. Montague v. Boston & Fairhaven Iron Works, 97 Mass. 502.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Montague v. Boston & Fairhaven Iron WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barrie v. QuinbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Acme Food Co. v. OlderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
- Tufts v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Barton v. RadclyffeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.