Legal Opinion

United States v. Quintin

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 3, 1984No. Court No. 81-9-01320Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The United States instituted this action to enforce the provisions of Section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Pub. L. 95-410, the Procedural Reform and Simplification Act of 1978 (19 U.S.C. § 1592], and collect the civil penalty provided therein. Exclusive jurisdiction in said action was granted to this Court by the Customs Courts Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-417.

The pertinent portion of the provisions involved, as set forth in 19 U.S.C. § 1592, provides:

§ 1592. Penalty against goods(a) Prohibition.(1) General rule. Without regard to whether the United States is or may be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Eighteen Packages of Dental InstrumentsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  2. United States v. Eighteen Packages of Dental InstrumentsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. United States v. Six Hundred & Sixty-One Bales of TobaccoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API