In Re the Arbitration Between Barnes & Council 82
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J.
After having paid a correction employee disability benefits for a three-year period, the Schenectady County Sheriffs Department directed him to report for light duty pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c (3). Resisting the directive, the employee filed a demand to arbitrate. The question before us is whether the employee can compel arbitration. For the reasons that follow, we hold that he cannot.
L
Schenectady County Correction Officer David Monroe had been receiving disability payments pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c when the County ordered him…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In Re the Arbitration Between Board of Education of Watertown City School District & Watertown Education Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Watertown v. State of New York Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re the Arbitration between Blackburne & Governor's Office of Employee RelationsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re the Arbitration Between Barnes & Council 82, AFSCMEAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by12 opinions
- Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- City of Watertown v. State of New York Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- City of New York v. Uniformed Fire Officers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bogenrieder v. Crippen Heating & Air ConditioningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Madison Realty Capital, L.P. v. Scarborough-St. James Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.