Legal Opinion

Smith v. Walker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1893No. 935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

Appellee brought suit in the court below against appellant, on a promissory note payable to the order of one C. C. Smith, alleging that at the time of the execution of the note to said appellee, the appellant, through inadvertence and the mutual mistake of the parties, wrote the name of said C. C. Smith, his father, as payee thereof, instead of appellee.

The complaint is in due form and properly alleges the execution of the note to appellee, with the exception of the mutual mistake of the parties in the name of the payee inserted therein. The note discloses on its face that it was executed as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Johnson v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Rapp v. KesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Gish v. GishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Keister v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Digan v. MandelIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API