Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1967No. 247PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant assigns error in that the court overruled his objection to the State’s witness using a blackboard sketch to illustrate his testimony.

“A witness may use a map or diagram, a photograph or a model of a place or a person or an object, to illustrate his testimony and make it more intelligible to the court and jury. It must of course be identified as portraying the scene with sufficient accuracy.” Stansbury: North Carolina Evidence, Witnesses, Sec. 34, p. 64.

Admittedly, the State had not sufficiently identified the sketch when the officer was asked to use it to illustrate his testimony.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coley Ex Rel. Coley v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Bullin v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HamletteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. SledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. YanceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API