Anderson v. Anderson
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 530 290 NEBRASKA REPORTS Even when viewed with the benefit of hindsight, counsel’s decision not to call Martin as a witness was correct. It is evi- dent from Martin’s subsequent deposition testimony that she could not corroborate Branch’s claim that he was alone in her home all morning before leaving to pick her up from work. Martin testified that she was with Branch in the morning until he took her to work in the afternoon. Faced with inconsistent testimony of this nature, a jury would likely have concluded that either Branch, Martin, or both of them were not telling…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kalkowski v. KalkowskiNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Reichert v. ReichertNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Garza v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Gress v. GressNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Millatmal v. MillatmalNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.