Legal Opinion
United States v. Mansur-Ramos
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 28, 2003No. 02-2704PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
In this sentencing appeal, defendant-appellant Guillermo Mansur-Ramos labors to persuade us that the district court erred in imposing too long a term of immurement and, to make matters worse, attaching an impermissible condition of supervised release to his sentence. Finding his arguments unconvincing, we affirm the sentence.
The facts are sordid, but straightforward. We derive them from the change-of-plea colloquy, the presentence investigation report, and the transcript of the disposition hearing. See United States v. Dietz, 950 F.2d 50, 51 (1st Cir.1991).
At all times…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. William A. DietzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Christopher J. RomoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. John D. BehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jesus Arturo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Turbides-LeonardoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Melendez-SantanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. ProchnerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Vazquez-MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.