Legal Opinion

Salafia v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 26, 2008No. Civil 3:07cv312 (JBA)Published

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Philip Salafia, now proceeding pro se, has sued the United States seeking damages for the failure of one of his companies, Internet Crimes, Inc. (“IC”). Invoking the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671-80 (“FTCA”), and the federal and Connecticut Constitutions, Salafia alleges that agents and personnel of the U.S. Army failed to properly investigate his complaint that a staff sergeant had improperly interfered with the business of Internet Crimes. The Government has moved to dismiss the case on a number of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API