Fisher v. Ohio Malleable Iron Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The sole question in this controversy is presented by the following facts, which either appear in the record or were admitted in open court by the defendant in error upon the trial of the case and upon the hearing in this court.
Since the defendant in error here admits the facts upon which the plaintiff in error’s contention is predi cated, its argument that the record does not present the question is untenable.
Statements of fact agreed to by counsel for all parties may be considered in the same manner as admissions made on the trial of the case. Springer v. Wasson, 25 N. M., 379, 183 P., 398.
T…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. KamrathOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Tex. Employers' Ass'n v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Springer v. WassonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by7 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- State ex rel. Bessler v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1952
- State ex rel. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. DickersonOhio Supreme Court · 1953
- State ex rel. Marion Power Shovel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- State ex rel. Marion Power Shovel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.