Legal Opinion

Chapliski v. Churchill Coal Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1985No. 02935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

Appellant, Churchill Coal Corporation, defendant below, appears before us seeking to vacate the order of'the court below. For the following reasons, we vacate that order and remand for further proceedings.

The facts and procedure of this case are long and involved and clearly set out in President Judge Krehel’s opinion.

On 28 November 1977, Plaintiffs and Defendant entered into a Security Agreement to purchase certain equipment and real estate.

On 22 May 1980, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against the Defendant averring that the Defendant violated the terms of the security agreement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1981
  2. Wallingford's Fruit House v. Inhabitants of Auburn (In Re Wallingford's Fruit House)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1983
  3. Cramer v. GroverUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1980
  4. Fitzgerald v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Constitution Bank v. TubbsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Sovereign Bank v. HarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control v. Columbia Organic Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Ex Parte ReichlynSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Constitution Bank v. TubbsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API