Legal Opinion

Carodenuto v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lewis R. Friedman, J.

In 1986 Congress adopted the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) (42 USC § 1395dd)1 which sets a Federal standard for certain aspects of emergency room treatment. This summary judgment motion by plaintiff and defendants’ cross motion to dismiss claims under *36342 USC § 1395dd call for the court to determine whether the EMTALA provides a new cause of action to be invoked in State court for improper emergency room treatment and the scope of that cause of action. Although there are cases in the Federal courts and in other States, there…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Caffaro v. TraynaNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Dance v. Town of SouthamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Deberry Ex Rel. Deberry v. Sherman Hospital Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. Reid v. Indianapolis Osteopathic Medical Hospital, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
  5. Evitt v. University Heights HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burks v. St. Joseph's HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. WellCare of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Betty Miller, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Allen Miller v. Laxeshkumar Patel, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Burks v. St. Joseph's HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API