Commonwealth v. Blaney
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
The only real issue in contention at the defendant’s trial on an indictment charging him with armed robbery, G. L. c. 265, § 17, was whether he had been misidentified by the victim. Because a double-pose, frontal and profile views, photograph of the defendant was intro duced in evidence without being severed when it was reasonably possible to separate the pictures, we reverse the judgment.
On December 9,1979, one Gary Manzo and one Caroline Travis were at work at Andrews Pharmacy in Wellesley. About 6:00 p.m. Manzo, the pharmacist-manager, approached a man standing at the pharmacy counter in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- People v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. McKennaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- United States v. Michael FosherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BlaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. BarberMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. RyanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. BlaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982