Ianotta v. Tishman Speyer Properties, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentCatterson, J.
I respectfully dissent because I believe that this case is indistinguishable from our holding in Santoni v Bertelsmann Prop., Inc. (21 AD3d 712 [2005]), and that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur cannot cure the deficiencies in the plaintiffs proof. I concur with the majority’s conclusion that res ipsa cannot exist independently of proof of some negligence. (Abbott v Page Airways, 23 NY2d 502 [1969].) The record, however, does not establish any negligence on the part of the landlord and so the doctrine should not be applied.
Res ipsa permits a jury to draw, the inference of negligence from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Abbott v. Page Airways, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Feblot v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Santoni v. Bertelsmann Property, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Graham v. WohlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.