Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ianotta v. Tishman Speyer Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 2007Published

1DissentCatterson, J.

I respectfully dissent because I believe that this case is indistinguishable from our holding in Santoni v Bertelsmann Prop., Inc. (21 AD3d 712 [2005]), and that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur cannot cure the deficiencies in the plaintiffs proof. I concur with the majority’s conclusion that res ipsa cannot exist independently of proof of some negligence. (Abbott v Page Airways, 23 NY2d 502 [1969].) The record, however, does not establish any negligence on the part of the landlord and so the doctrine should not be applied.

Res ipsa permits a jury to draw, the inference of negligence from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Abbott v. Page Airways, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Feblot v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Santoni v. Bertelsmann Property, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Graham v. WohlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API