Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Astor

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 9, 1948No. 20987Published

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

On an appeal like this, where the issue of breach of contract must be resolved largely on the oral testimony of witnesses heard by a referee whose findings were accepted by the district judge, there must be an absence of any supporting testimony or something inherently improbable in the testimony relied on to support the findings-before we can say that they are “clearly erroneous.” Unless we can come to that conclusion the findings are to be given effect, as we have many times held. In re Lawrence, 2 Cir., 134 F. 843; In re Oriel, 2 Cir., 23 F.2d 409; Oneida Valley Nat.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Savage Arms Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Mergenthaler v. DaileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API