Legal Opinion

United States of America, and v. Kenneth F. Redwitz, And

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1964No. 15300_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge-

Appellant was convicted of receiving and selling an automobile, which was moving in interstate commerce, knowing it to have been stolen, in violation of the Dyer Act, Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 2313. He claims reversible error in the trial court’s refusal to grant a continuance to his counsel on the ground that they did not have sufficient opportunity to acquaint themselves with the law and the facts of the case; that, further, the District Court improperly and frequently intervened in the examination of witnesses, by asking the District Attorney questions concerning…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. United States v. Keith A. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. Robert Eugene Franklin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Keith A. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API