People's Home Savings Bank v. Rauer
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. George H. Bahrs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion
Appellant, in his petition for a rehearing, asks us to determine a point not passed on in the opinion heretofore filed in this case, viz., as to the validity of a transfer of stock made after the banking corporation went into insolvency. The findings of the court show that the corporation went into insolvency May 1, 1894, and that the transfer of stock took place January 3, 1895. Appellant contends that under these facts the transfer of stock was void. If he be correct in this latter contention, defendant did not in any sense become a stockholder of the corporation plaintiff, and the result…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wheeler v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Estate of Westerfield v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Thompson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899