Legal Opinion

Wharton v. City of Oskaloosa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 7, 1968No. 52926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECKER, Justice.

Plaintiffs appealed from special sewer assessments levied by City of Oskaloosa. Four appeals involving five parcels of land were consolidated for trial. The trial court reduced all assessments. As to four parcels the reduction was on the basis of actual benefit to the land and as to one parcel the reduction was on the basis of 25 percent of value. We affirm.

The city council determined a sewer was necessary in the south part of Oskaloosa. All property assessments in controversy are against relatively large parcels. All are residentially zoned but most are contiguous or very…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Hampton v. BurrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. Rood v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. Beh v. City of West Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. Brenton v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. HL Munn Lumber Company v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Goodell v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. Mulford v. City of Iowa FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. City of Clive v. Iowa Concrete Block & Material Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. Clinton National Bank v. City of CamancheSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API