Legal Opinion

Clark v. . Cox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, J., did not sit on the hearing of this case. It is contended on the part of the plaintiffs that Louisa Clark and Olivia Cox, nee Norfleet, who died during the lifetime of Lucy S. Edwards, nee Norfleet, took no interest under the deed in trust that could be transmitted by descent; that their heirs, who are plaintiffs and defendants, took as purchasers individually as if they had been named in the said deed, and that the (96) fund should therefore be divided per capita and not per stirpes.

A perusal of the deed very clearly shows that it was not made in opsconsilii, and the language used…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Starnes v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Bowen v. Hackney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Watson v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Holmes v. . HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Fulbright v. . YoderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Mohn v. MohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Malloy v. . AchesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Holderness v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API