Moore v. Caledonia Natural Gas District
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING REQUEST FOR THREE-JUDGE PANEL
SENTER, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the court on the defendants’ motion for the empaneling of a three-judge court to review the plaintiffs’ claims for violation of § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c. The plaintiffs do not dispute that a three-judge court is necessary. Additionally, the defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment of the § 5 claim. Because the court finds the plaintiffs’ § 5 claims to be without merit and insubstantial, the defendants’ motion is denied, the plaintiffs’ § 5…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Perkins v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Hampton County Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Board of Supervisors of Warren Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeJulio v. GeorgiaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- Ritter v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- City of Combes, Tx v. East Rio Hondo Water Supply Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Smith v. ClarkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996