Weiland v. Hogan
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Codd, J. Bill by Frank Weiland and others against Morris P. Hogan and others for an injunction and other relief. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
(after stating'the facts). The contention is made on behalf of appellants that this by-law is void for various enumerated reasons. The authorities upon this point are not uniform, and though the *631question is one of interest, we have found it unnecessary to pass upon it in this case, for the reason that, whether valid or void, considered strictly as a by-law, it can be sustained as an agreement entered into between all the parties in interest. It should be noted that we are not called upon here to determine the effect of such a by-law upon a stockholder who had not given his assent to its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New England Trust Co. v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Barrett v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Clark v. E. C. Clark Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Garrett v. Philadelphia Lawn Mower Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Lindsay's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Palmer v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Baumohl v. GoldsteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Doss v. YinglingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
- Matter of American Fibre Chair Seat Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Model Clothing House v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.