Imlach v. Seigel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to the provisions of section 546 of the Civil Practice Act.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
On the 28th of February, 1921, plaintiff individually and as life tenant and executrix of the will of Charles Smith, and the defendant entered into a contract in writing whereby plaintiff agreed to sell and convey to the defendant and defendant agreed to purchase the premises known as No. 107 East Thirty-first street, borough of Manhattan, New York. It was provided in the agreement that an application should be made to the Supreme Court for authority “ to effect such sale, in order to vest good title in the purchaser.” Plaintiff, pursuant to the contract, presented to the Supreme…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fleming v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Hume v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Ridley v. WalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Whittier Estates, Inc. v. Manhattan Savings BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
- Justino v. FassiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962