Mansfield Borough's Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 167, Oct. T., 1893, by Mansfield Borough, from order of Q. S. Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1891, No. 80, making absolute rule to vacate order dismissing appeals. Rule to vacate order dismissing appeals. The facts appear by the following opinion of the court below, by White, J.: “ The record in this case is confusing. The petition for viewers was presented Nov. 18, 1891, and same day viewers appointed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 167, Oct. T., 1893, by Mansfield Borough, from order of Q. S. Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1891, No. 80, making absolute rule to vacate order dismissing appeals. Rule to vacate order dismissing appeals. The facts appear by the following opinion of the court below, by White, J.: “ The record in this case is confusing. The petition for viewers was presented Nov. 18, 1891, and same day viewers appointed. They made report Dec. 9, 1891, which was ‘confirmed nisi, and ordered to be filed.’ March 5, 1892, petitions of numerous parties were presented for appeals, and indorsed by the court ‘…
1Opinion of the Court
Per. Curiam,
An examination of this somewhat confused record has satisfied us that there was no error in allowing the appeals of J. Charles Bedell and others. They were in time, and it would have been error to have refused them. There is nothing in either of the specifications of error that would warrant a reversal of the order complained of.
Order affirmed, with costs to be paid by appellant.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Wright v. County of LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- McKonly v. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1930