Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1969No. 40090PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment and sentence .entered after a jury found him guilty of violating the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act.

The sole question presented is whether the trial court erred when it denied defendánt’s motion to suppress certain evidence upon the grounds that a search warrant wás illegally executed. The validity oí the search warrant is not questioned. ' .....

Defendant contends that the method of executing the search pursuant to the warrant violated the following: U.S. Const, amend. 4:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. DianaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. State v. SurgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. CardenasWashington Supreme Court · 2002

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API