Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Radford

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided April 19, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

MacNeille, J.,

We are considering a rule to Show cause why plaintiff should not pay $350 as garnishee’s attorneys’ fees.

The plaintiff, James M. O’Brien, being a creditor of the defendant, William H. Radford, proceeded against Commercial National Bank & Trust Company and G. M. Radford as garnishees. Interrogatories were filed and answers made *178which denied that garnishee had any money or property in its hands belonging to the defendant. The lower court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, but later granted defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v., which was sustained on March 9,1934, when the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. RadfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Lummis v. Big Sandy Land & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API