Legal Opinion

Radmacher v. Archuleta

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1979No. 17-816, SC 25561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This was a suit in equity brought to establish an easement across defendants’ land and to require defendants to remove a fence. Plaintiff was awarded a decree and defendants appealed. This court raised the issue at the time of argument whether or not the notice of appeal had been timely filed and, thus, whether the court had jurisdiction. Counsel was subsequently requested to file memoranda on the subject. If the court is without jurisdiction to hear the appeal, it is its duty to dismiss the appeal upon its own motion. Industrial Leasing v. Van Dyke, 285 Or 375, 377, 591 P2d 352 (1979);…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Van DykeOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lane County Escrow Service, Inc. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Martin v. CITY OF ASHLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schmidling v. DoveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Sola v. ClostermannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. CREDIT BUREAU, INC. OF GEORGIA v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Multistate Tax Commission v. Dow Chemical Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API