Legal Opinion

State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Silverman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1980No. 62082, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the

State Bar Grievance Board which adopted a Hearing Panel’s finding that petitioner Silverman’s conduct caused "reasonable misunderstanding and disapproval” on the part of his client, Russel Se-bright, thereby exposing the "legal profession to obloquy, contempt, censure and reproach” in violation of Supreme Court Rule for the State Bar 15, § 2(2) 1 and affirmed a 30-day suspension.

In February of 1971, Sebright hired Silverman to collect on a note owed to Sebright by Green, Inc. Silverman instituted a suit against Green, Inc. as the principal obligor and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In the Matter of FreedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. CoraceMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. FreidMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of GrimesMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Charpentier v. Canteen Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Grievance Administrator v. NickelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Grievance Administrator v. NickelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API