Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Floyd

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1926No. Appeal 31PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The jury in the court below found that plaintiff suffered serious injuries through the negligent operation by defendant of an automobile and returned a verdict fixing his damages at $2,000. Defendant’s point for binding instructions having been refused and his motions for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v. overruled, this appeal followed. The assignments charge error: (a) in above rulings; (b) in refusing defendant’s second point; and (c) in sustaining an objection to the admission in evidence of a certain written statement signed by one of plaintiff’s wit nesses…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Wood, AppellantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Shannon v. CastnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Mountain v. American Window Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Robb v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Uhler v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OylerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Quartz v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Michael v. Kirchner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API