Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Prosek

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1997No. 00229PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the suppression court’s order dated January 29, 1996, granting Prosek’s motion to suppress statements made by him and evidence seized by the State College *1307We reverse and remand Police Department, for a trial.1

Initially, we note that when reviewing the Commonwealth’s appeal from the decision of the suppression court, “we must consider only the evidence of the ... appel-lee’s witnesses and so much of the evidence for the prosecution as read in the context of the record as a whole remains uncontradict-ed.” Commonwealth v. Baer, 439…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. ShoatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. FentoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MannionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. BuschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. BattagliaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. PizarroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API