Legal Opinion · Dissent

Forest County v. Poppy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1927Published

1DissentEschweiler, J.

With the court’s disposal of three of the items involved I disagree.

The complaint alleged the receipt by the defendant county treasurer of over $17,000 for which he had failed to account as required by law, leaving that amount of a shortage, and that such sum was appropriated and converted by the de*282fendant to his own use. No claim was asserted of possible negligence by the defendant treasurer in collecting moneys due the county.

After testimony was taken it was admitted that the maximum amount for which he could be held was less than $7,000, and-was the amount for which plaintiff had judgment.

T…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Union State Bank v. Peoples State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. John A. Tolman & Co. v. InfusinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Merrill v. FochtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API