Legal Opinion

Strother v. Law

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Writ of Error to the Superior Court of Chicago.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The plaintiff in error, as widow of Bolton F. Strother, deceased, claims the right to redeem and to have dower in certain premises described in the bill, which were sold under a mortgage, executed by her and her late husband, to Van H. Higgins. It is not doubted that the mortgage, in its execution and acknowledgment, was sufficient to convey all the right, title and interest of the parties, and to bar their equity of redemption, if the same was legally foreclosed. It was sought to foreclose the mortgage by a sale out of court, under a clause contained therein, conferring an irrevocable power…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vansant v. AllmonIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Sargent v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Pardee v. LindleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Hunt v. EnnisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1821

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Warnecke v. LembcaIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Darst v. BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Sanford v. KaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Arn v. Operators Royalty & Producing Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API