Legal Opinion

People v. Villanova

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant concedes that the suppression court correctly denied his request to call the complainant as a witness at the Wade hearing (People v Peterkin, 151 AD2d 407, affd 75 NY2d 985). He contends, however, that the trial court erred in denying his request to reopen the Wade hearing when the complainant and his friend both testified, contrary to the police officers’ testimony and the prosecutor’s representations at the hearing, that they were escorted to the scene of the show-up by other police officers in order to identify the individuals who had been apprehended. In view of this testimony,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PeterkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. MendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. PeterkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. OlmoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. BaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API