Legal Opinion
Partridge v. Bond
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided December 12, 1936No. Nos. 367, 368PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLLARD, District Judge.
The complainants in the above-entitled causes, appearing specially, have moved the court to remand these causes to the Hustings Court of the City of Petersburg, Va., upon the ground that written notice of the petition and bond for removal was not given to them prior to the filing of the same in said Hustings Court as required in section 72, title 28, U.S.C.A.
The facts in the two causes which are pertinent to the motions before the court are the same, and are stipulated as follows: ' “The complainants filed their bill in the Clerk’s Office of the Hustings Court of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- MacKay v. Uinta Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Babbitt v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Williams v. New York, P. & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Miller v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- Goins v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flowers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Kovell v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
- Bluffton Real Estate Co. v. WysongDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1938