Legal Opinion
Martyr v. Mazur-Hart
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 13, 1992No. Civ. 90-1086-FRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FRYE, Judge:
Plaintiff, Robert Martyr, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three staff members of the Oregon State Hospital. Martyr contends that his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution are violated by the actions of defendants in censoring his outgoing mail. Martyr also brings a pendent state claim. On September 10 and 11, 1991, the claims of Martyr were tried to the court. This opinion constitutes Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as required by Fed. R.Civ.P. 52(a).
FINDINGS…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Hightower Ex Rel. Dehler v. OlmsteadDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996