Legal Opinion
Schouboe v. Wyoming Department of Transportation
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 19, 2010No. S-09-0190PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[¶ 1] Eric Schouboe appeals a hearing examiner's order upholding his implied consent suspension. Schouboe contends that the Wyoming Department of Transportation (WY-DOT) did not prove he was in actual physical control of his vehicle. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Schouboe lists five issues:
I. Did the Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) carry its burden to establish the necessary element of "actual physical control" by a preponderance of the evidence in [Schouboe's] Implied Consent Suspension?
II. Whether the Office of Administrative Hearing's (OAH) finding of fact that the "keys…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Dale v. S & S Builders, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Wyoming Consumer Group v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Adams v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vasco v. State, Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Miller v. State ex rel. Wyoming Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2012