Legal Opinion
Sellars v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 5, 1996No. 4:94-cv-40333PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEWBLATT, Senior District Judge.
The decision in this case depends on the interpretation placed on opinions upon which both parties rely. Huizinga v. United States, 68 F.3d 139 (6th Cir.1995). 1
Because plaintiffs rely on a broad interpretation or broad meaning of the principal opinion and its generalized application to the issue in this case, and the government relies on what was not ruled upon or mentioned in the principal opinion and notes the subjects not dealt with as pointed out in the concurrence, it is essential to examine very carefully the opinions in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Bank v. Eames & Brown, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Andrew G. Huizinga v. United States of America, & Counterclaim Ralph Scotese Larry L. Vanderbeek, CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- People v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Imperial Tile & Carpet, Inc. v. Trustees of the Tile, Terrazzo, Marble & Pre-Cast Panel Workers Industry Insurance Fund (In Re Imperial Tile & Carpet, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
- Detroit Metropolitan Area Executive Committee of the Bricklayers, Masons & Plasterers International Union v. Leto Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re McGeeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Kriegish v. Lipan (In Re Kriegish)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002