Legal Opinion

United States v. Clarke

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 18, 1926No. 2621PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of articles known both as dress buckles and as dress clasps, together with articles known as slides. All were assessed for duty by the collector as articles designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, at 80 per centum ad valorem under paragraph-1428 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:

Par. 1428. * * * and articles valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces, designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, such as and including buckles,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. European Watch & Clock Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. United States v. MurphyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Kresge Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. European Watch & Clock Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API