Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1971No. Appeal, 230PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barbieri,

The only question for our consideration on this appeal is whether or not a statement given by appellant to the police was improperly admitted at trial because of the failure of the police to give appellant the Miranda * warnings during one of the phases of the interrogation process. We hold that, under the circumstances of this case, appellant’s statement was properly admitted at trial.

Appellant, then sixteen years old, was arz’ested on May 30, 1969, at 7:50 A.M. by a Detective Alexander who, ten minutes later, gave appellant the Miranda warnings. Detective…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. William Lee Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. United States v. Herbert Arthur OsterburgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth. v. HossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. State v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API