Hirschorn v. Falk
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.
In this proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, the petitioner seeks a review of the determination of the State Civil Service Commission finding him physically disqualified for the position of court officer and court attendant and an order directing the respondents to place him on the eligible list.
The notice of examination for the position of court officer and court attendant enumerated the courts in the First and Second Judicial Departments in which appointees might be called upon to serve. Among the courts so enumerated were criminal courts. The statement of the duties of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eisig v. ConwayNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- In re VitaleNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Vitale v. ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- Button v. RockefellerNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Hirschorn v. FalkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959