DeWater v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
— The issue in this sexual harassment case is whether the State of Washington is vicariously liable for the discriminatory acts of a foster parent toward a worker hired and supervised by the foster parent but paid by the State. The trial court dismissed the Plaintiffs action on summary judgment. We affirm.
We hold a foster parent is not an "employee” of the State for purposes of the law against discrimination, ROW 49.60; therefore, the State is not vicariously liable for the foster parent’s alleged acts of harassment.
FACTS
Thelma DeWater brought this action for employment discrimination against…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Glasgow v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Mitzner Ex Rel. Bishop v. State, Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Fahn v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Aba Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.