Legal Opinion

DeWater v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1996No. 63285-5PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

— The issue in this sexual harassment case is whether the State of Washington is vicariously liable for the discriminatory acts of a foster parent toward a worker hired and supervised by the foster parent but paid by the State. The trial court dismissed the Plaintiffs action on summary judgment. We affirm.

We hold a foster parent is not an "employee” of the State for purposes of the law against discrimination, ROW 49.60; therefore, the State is not vicariously liable for the foster parent’s alleged acts of harassment.

FACTS

Thelma DeWater brought this action for employment discrimination against…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Glasgow v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Mitzner Ex Rel. Bishop v. State, Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Fahn v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Aba Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API