Legal Opinion

Fairbank v. Haentzsche

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1874PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. G-ary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

In December, 1872, Mary Arnold was employed in one department of appellants’ factory. There were in the same room with her 18 or 20 persons, mostly females, all engaged in the work of making tin pails in which lard was to be packed. What was then but one room had formerly constituted two. The partition, however, that divided them had all been taken down, except a small portion left for support. Around the sides of the room were placed benches, at which sat the girls, whose business it was to solder the tin work. It was deemed expedient to change the engine from one room of the factory to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. SchymanowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. StricklingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  4. Magee v. North Pacific Coast RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Wilder v. Great Western Cereal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API