Legal Opinion

Headley v. Harris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Hale Law and Equity Court. Heard before Hon. Charles E. Waller. Detinue byO: W. Harris against J. A. Headley. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. Transferred from the Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

A careful review of the evidence in this case leads to the conclusion that the findings and judgment of the trial court, sitting without a jury, are well founded, and ought to be affirmed.

(1, 2) While one of the defendant’s chief witnesses was being examined by counsel, and immediately following his statement in denial of a fact which seems to have been overwhelmingly established by the other witnesses, counsel for plaintiff exclaimed: “Look out now! Hold on I Watch how you testify! Somebody may be indicted for perjury?”

The bill of exceptions recites that: “Defendant’s counsel objected to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Neumiller v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Shelley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Blevins v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API