Legal Opinion

Walsh, Adm'r v. Venable

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is an action against a contractor ■and owners of the property to' enforce a materialman’s lien for lumber used in the construction of a house. Plaintiff seeks to recover an alleged balance of $874.74 against the contractor, one S. T. Venable, and to impress the same as a lien against the property of the owners F. C. Notrott and his wife, Emma.

The facts disclosed are that the Notrotts entered into a contract with S. T. Venable, a contractor, to build for them a house in the City of Brookfield, Linn County, Missouri, the plans and specifications therefor being prepared by one W. M.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. RushSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Wilkerson v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Hellmuth v. BenoistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Clemens v. KnoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Oxford v. DudleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowman v. RahmoellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API