D'Aquila v. D'Aquila

HOGAN, Presiding Judge.

This is a second appeal from the distribution of marital property in a dissolution of marriage case. Upon the first appeal, this court held that the respondent’s vested and fully matured pension plan was marital property which should have been apportioned between the parties. In re Marriage of D’Aquila, 680 S.W.2d 446[2] (Mo.App.1984). On remand, the trial court found the respondent’s pension benefits to be marital property and awarded those benefits to the respondent, Daniel D’Aquila. No further evidence was heard.

The parties were married in June 1956. They were…