Legal Opinion

Lee v. Wilmington Savings Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 7, 1923No. 14651PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

This was a suit on a promissory note, whereby, in accordance with a provision therein, the plaintiff exercised its option to treat the note as past due on account of default in payment of interest. The plea of the defendant set forth: 1st. “Prior to said interest coupon becoming due, it was agreed between defendant and plaintiffs, through their agent and attorneys, Tilson & McKinney, that if said interest was not paid when due, defendant was to pay an additional and valuable consideration for the time taken to pay same beyond time said interest coupon was due.” By a proffered amendment the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tatum v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Alston v. WingfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  3. King v. LipseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Holmes v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turpin v. North American Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Cottle v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. JarrettDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1942
  4. Quillian v. MabryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Helton v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API