Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Holland Furnace Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1959No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case, the decedent, Peter Mitchell, was employed by the appellant, Holland Furnace Company, as a service salesman, whose business it was to solicit orders,

On July, 1955, he Was working with One Johri Kidda, ah assistant sales engineer for the employer, in the City. of Northampton, Northampton County,. Pennsylvania,. soliciting orders on, alternate sides, of Dewey Avenue. . When the decedent had finished his side of the-street-he went to- the home of Louis Bartholomew, 2260 Dewey AvénUé, where Kidda remarked about the' “loaded’’ cherry tree'…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baumann v. Howard J. Ehmke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Borough of Plum & Bituminous Casualty Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Maher v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Baby's Room v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Dzurko v. Pilot Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. McCafferty v. Masten Transportation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API