Legal Opinion

Van Horn v. Demarest

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 26, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Final hearing on bill, answers, replications and proofs, taken in open court.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, Y. 0.

It is somewhat difficult to determine under what head of equity, 'if any, the bill of complaint in this cause can be classified. It is not a bill for the specific performance of any contract. Ho contract is alleged or proved which was capable of specific performance when the bill was filed, as the complainant then well knew. The bill perhaps may be best described as a bill for compensation or damages on account of the breach of a contract alleged to have been made by the. testator, Garret C. Yan Horn, with the complainant, by the terms of which Garret C. Yan Horn legally bound…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Webb v. B.C. Rogers Poultry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Galloway v. EichellsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  3. Welch v. VeasleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Welsh v. HourNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  5. Zuckermandel v. ZuckermandelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API